The Truth About the Biden-Harris Regime's "Plans" to Block Out the Sun
The Truth About the Biden-Harris Regime's "Plans" to Block Out the Sun
It's bad, but it's not what you might think.
Corporate media is curious. Conservative media is chuckling. Alternative media is sounding the klaxons. Meanwhile, the puppet masters over the Biden-Harris regime are fist-bumping each other over another expansion of the climate change Overton Window.
The White House dropped a report Friday detailing their support for research into blocking sunlight in their efforts to fight climate change. As Michael Snyder noted, this concept was already being tossed around by the European Union earlier in the week. That didn't garner the attention the Globalist Elite Cabal expected, so they commanded the White House to sign onto the ludicrous concept a few days later.
Let's be clear: Even the most unhinged climate change cultist wouldn't think this sounds like a good idea. Lest we forget, these are the people who claim nuclear power is bad and cow farts are dangerous. One might think people who are so gullible would latch onto a sun-blocking maneuver, but that's not the case. The cultists aren't interested in any solution that does not force totalitarian control on their neighbors, the downfall of capitalism, and a bearhug embrace of Neo-Marxism.
Blocking the sun just doesn't check enough of their climate change cult boxes.
This so-called "potential solution" is designed to push insanity levels to eleven so they can reel it back in with horrible ideas that are slightly less insane. Those who are against monitoring personal carbon emissions and tying the results to one's ability to live their day-to-day lives might find the notion intrusive, but it's better than blocking out the sun, right? That's why idiocy is proposed as plausible by the Globalist Elite Cabal.
Here are the details about the White House's drop from Discern Reporter:
White House Supports Research Into Blocking the Sun
A recently published research document on the White House website has shed light on the Biden administration's willingness to explore the concept of blocking sunlight as a potential measure to combat climate change. The document, released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy on Friday, reveals that the team has been studying "geoengineering" methods aimed at preventing sun rays from exacerbating global warming.
The University of Oxford defines "geoengineering" as the intentional large-scale intervention in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change. The report titled "Congressionally-Mandated Report on Solar Radiation Modification" outlines the specific geoengineering methods under consideration by the Biden administration, including "stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and marine cloud brightening," along with research into "cirrus cloud thinning."
The introduction to the report clarifies that research on "space-based approaches" has not been a focus due to the relative ease of implementing atmospheric approaches.
The document emphasizes that it is primarily a research plan aimed at understanding the potential impacts of solar radiation modification (SRM) rather than a blueprint for deployment. The research would contribute to a better understanding of basic climate processes, the effects of human greenhouse gas emissions, and the outcomes of SRM.
The summary highlights that a research program exploring the scientific and societal implications of SRM would enable informed decisions on its potential risks and benefits as part of climate policy. It also acknowledges that such a program would prepare the United States for possible SRM deployment by other public or private actors.
The report points out that SRM could offer the prospect of significant planetary cooling within a few years.
However, the White House issued a separate statement assuring the public that there are no plans at present to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification.
As w/ completely insane WuFlu “policies”, directives, mandates, that made no sense from the beginning & became laughable by the end - it’s not at all about public health, & it’s not at all about “battling climate change” or “saving the planet”. They also never think through the consequences of those policies, directives & mandates - just as they didn’t w/ lockdowns, masking & mandatory jabs, or they know the consequences & keep them buried.
Never mind that petroleum is necessary for EVERYTHING anyway, including wind turbines & solar panels, not to mention everything from plastic to cell phones & computers & everything else comprising modern convenience.
Never mind that electric vehicles & the batteries to run them create devastating child labor issues in 3rd world countries, that the rare earth minerals are in short supply & that market is being corralled by China, that replacing those batteries costs a fortune, that the infrastructure to power them is not here, that the vehicles are so heavy that regular parking garages can’t support them, that most people can’t afford them, that they spontaneously catch fire & it’s turning out that manufacturing them & driving them is more destructive than gas engines. I LMAO when Gruesome Newsom pontificated that CA would get rid of gas vehicles by 2030 or 2035 & a week later, he was imploring the citizenry who own EVs not to power up their cars to save the grid. And only about 10% of the population have EVa! What happens when it’s 100%, EVERYWHERE, which is “the plan”???? It will never happen, & THAT’S the plan, to take away our freedom to move about as we see fit.
How to dispose of spent car batteries, wind turbines & solar panels & what burying those or sending them into space does to the environment & “saving the planet”???? Ditto for toxic chemicals canvassing the skies.
Every single thing they do is meant to destroy - human flourishing, decimating eco-systems including the very air we breathe, waterways, animals, migration routes, vegetation, birds, & insects...all creatures great & small. All you have to do is look at the death & destruction to all of those things with chem trails & miles & miles of wind farms (onshore & off), solar panel acres & the like without a peep of protest from the usual environment mental midgets.
If an oil company wants to build a simple dirt road, the HYSTERIA & lawsuits to protect a single type of insect or animal is ratcheted to “11” but utter silence for miles & miles of the above-referenced that completely destroy EVERYTHING in their paths.
It’s my understanding that “blocking the sun” would lead to cooler temps, shortened growing seasons, terrible winters, which then leads to food shortages & energy overload. Genius!
In addition, they can’t predict the weather year-to-year, month-to-month, day-to-day or even minute-to-minute. Just the other day, I watched Weather.com predict 100% chance of rain at a certain hour that plummeted to 40% in the space of 15 minutes. And yet we’re to believe they can predict an increase of a degree or 2 50 years from now....
The hubris of mankind (the worst of them, anyway), to believe they can conquer a respiratory “virus” or “block the sun” would be ludicrous & laughable if it wasn’t so frightening.
Please see my book, Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control for a history of science with no heroes, only hubris. Columbia University Press, 2010, also in paper. I served on the National Academy panel on "Climate Intervention" (2015) and suggested that what had been called "geoengineering" was really just climate intervention, with no understanding of the ultimate effects or consequences.