This isn't new information to those who have been paying close attention, but the fact that it's finally getting acknowledged by a highly respected medical journal is a breakthrough.
Jun 21, 2022·edited Jun 21, 2022Liked by JD Rucker
There have been many studies like this but this is the first in a tier one journal. I wonder why a pro-vaxx journal like this has turned, at least on NI. Possible ethics and guilty consciences on the editorial board? Seeing the wave coming and trying to get out in front? Time will tell.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
No... Not to get ahead of the virus... not to assuage a guilty conscience (they have no such guilty conscience). Why then? The only viable reason I've heard so far, from JD Rucker himself i believe, is to set the stage for blaming President Trump. Our President did the right thing based on the info he and all others had, and pushed thru development of vaccines like no one could thought possible -- but now it might be claimed that Trump was reckless in doing so, because the rush meant entirely insufficient testing etc. and now it's caused a serious problem of people dying prematurely.
Of course, as always, such blame would be an utter lie, but many of the same people who screamed the loudest at those not complying with mask "mandates", etc, would likely get on that band wagon, too.
“Oh how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope.” — Martin Luther
I always wonder why they don't worry about their own health? Though there's no injection mandate to work at the CDC as Rochelle Walensky admitted in live testimony before Congress, still, she has three children and must have good friends and family members that she would be concerned about? But it goes way beyond her as we know. So many medical professionals know what's going on but also know that if they speak up they risk losing their job. I just had a long conversation with patient relations at Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates in Boston about this. They basically admitted that they have to go along with whatever the CDC decides.
Is this actually a news event? That natural immunity is superior -- and that it's actually a thing? That injecting lipid nanoparticles and other trash makes no sense?? "Medicine" and "science" have disgraced themselves to a point of non-recovery, IMO.
We must support Senator Rand Paul in his quest to bring justice to Tony Fauci, md. His work in funding (with US taxpayer monies) a PRC lab with (USA) illegal research should be cause for some jail time. This is not to mention his funding of the use experimental aid medicines onthose 85 +/- little black children orphans in NY in 2005 should be brought to light. He is a monster hiding as a public servant/spokesperson. Plus, his approval of funding for the 30+ illegal biowar labs in Ukraine is more than sufficient for a strong legal charge.
So I'm listening to a group of intelligence agents talk about we are in a CCP bio war on the Bannon war room. but what I don't get is-that if this is a CCP lead war why did the US block access to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for viral illnesses? US government Denyed these safe drugs is inconsistent with a CCP only war on the US population.
Un-Vaxed WITH PREVIOUS INFECTION AND NATURAL IMMUNITY.
Secondly, the Expose article is also VERY misleading. While it is true that the most-vax'd are the most-hospitalized-and-dead, most people who die are very old, and the very old are vax'd at the 99% percent level in CA, where as the younger folks at less than the 85% level. We shall consequently see the Vax'd dying at higher rates than the Un-Vax'd for any reason, all the time !
I am NOT saying the Vax's are Safe and Effective, and even if effective to some extent against CoVid, that does not mean they they don't increase your chance of dying. HOWEVER, articles such as this and the Expose article leave the camp fighting against the Vax open to a world of criticism.
The article reads like "more vaxx=more infected" is a bug. It's not. It's a feature.
We are now under constant threat of the return of the bogus mitigations efforts that ruined our economy and harmed so many people. The state's response to rising infection rates? "Get vaxxed." But if getting vaxxed results in more infections, this plays right into the state's hands. Vaxx and boost enough people and you could drive up the infection rate to a point where the state will respond as if the pandemic is still in the pre-vaccine stage.
1) Nobody, including the article writer, asked what percentage of the population is vaccinated. 85% of the Canadian population is vaccinated. So 15% is not. 30% of the deaths are from unvaccinated people. So guess what - you’re twice as likely to die if you’re not vaxxed.
2) “natural immunity” means having had Covid. OF COURSE the antibodies from having had real Covid are better at protecting the body from the vaccines. But guess what, that’s if you don’t die from Covid first if not vaxxed.
So, you ACTUALLY think you just refuted a peer-reviewed article in the New England Journal of Medicine? ffs, they normalized the data to be a rate per 100k. BASIC STUFF, Cinderella.
[insert emoji of dude in white suit laughing].
fyi - the death rate among 3 jabbed was 70% of the total, but they are <50% of the population - so how does that work out?
Moreover, the unjabbed calc is false - it relies on using the census from almost 10 years ago and subtracting out the known vaxxed to get the 'unvaxxed' population. But that is WRONG because the demographics have changed.
finally, people are counted as unjabbed until 2 weeks AFTER the shot. FRAUD, baby!
What misterkel said, plus what about all cause mortality? Is it reduced post vaccination? (Pfizer’s own data suggests not.) You can’t die from Covid if you died of something else after vaccination.
I think a lot of the unvaxed include street people, druggies, etc. who are poorly nourished and not in good health. Some end up in hospital for drug overdose. They may be Covid positive, and if thry are, I believe their deaths are still attributed to Covid. Personally, I do not think it has been proven that the vaxes do much at all.
No matter what their angle in finally acknowledging some truth, there is no excuse for the denials, the demonization of ethical scientists and physicians who have been telling the truth, and the outright lies and subterfuge involved in serving their Pharma beast god.
Yes, it's good that admissions are finally being made by the bastards. But I can't even verbalize the simmering rage I feel over all of this.
I had seen Gates promoting universal vaccines for years before covid, and Microsoft has forced upgrades on our pc - even against our wishes, as they reconfigure the pc as they see fit.
NYT promoted this a great achievement, but I seen it as very very dangerous to let give someone else the keys to our bodies.
That was my first flag, and with some investigating, I stumbled across Dr. Carrie Madej, and from there so much more. All of the warnings she had discussed are truly coming to light now.
Remember when Moderna had the webpage talking about your cells as the 'operating system' and their jabs as the 'software of life'? If anyone can find that webpage, I would really appreciate it.
That was close so thank you! I found part of the image in Moderna's filing to the SEC. Scroll down about 3 pages. It seems Moderna scrubbed this image from its website.
You are such liars! These shots do nothing but cause more illness and death. I know first hand from many people. You try to debunk TRUTH and call it lies!
No... Not to get ahead of the virus... not to assuage a guilty conscience (they have no such guilty conscience). Why then? The only viable reason I've heard so far, from JD Rucker himself i believe, is to set the stage for blaming President Trump. Our President did the right thing based on the info he and all others had, and pushed thru development of vaccines like no one could thought possible -- but now it might be claimed that Trump was reckless in doing so, because the rush meant entirely insufficient testing etc. and now it's caused a serious problem of people dying prematurely.
Of course, as always, such blame would be an utter lie, but many of the same people who screamed the most at those not complying with mask "mandates", etc, would likely get on that band wagon, too.
Having read the source paper it says nothing of the sort. What it actually says in Table 2 is that 2 doses is highly effective against serious infection (97% against Omicron BA1 and 77% against Omicron BA2), but that after six months effectness against mild infection is effectively zero. The summary in the New England Journal of Medicine is shockingly bad and seems to have been written to grab a headline.
There have been many studies like this but this is the first in a tier one journal. I wonder why a pro-vaxx journal like this has turned, at least on NI. Possible ethics and guilty consciences on the editorial board? Seeing the wave coming and trying to get out in front? Time will tell.
Makes sense trying to get out in front. Can't hide the deaths. More coming at a faster pace is my sense, deaths as intended.
Exactly
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
No... Not to get ahead of the virus... not to assuage a guilty conscience (they have no such guilty conscience). Why then? The only viable reason I've heard so far, from JD Rucker himself i believe, is to set the stage for blaming President Trump. Our President did the right thing based on the info he and all others had, and pushed thru development of vaccines like no one could thought possible -- but now it might be claimed that Trump was reckless in doing so, because the rush meant entirely insufficient testing etc. and now it's caused a serious problem of people dying prematurely.
Of course, as always, such blame would be an utter lie, but many of the same people who screamed the loudest at those not complying with mask "mandates", etc, would likely get on that band wagon, too.
Yes, why indeed? Perhaps things aren’t so hunky dory behind the vaccine iron curtain. What are they whispering to each other?
The Jewish Vaccine: The Truth ‘Truthers’ Ignore . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/126859700/the-jewish-vaccine-the-truth-truthers-ignore
.
“Oh how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope.” — Martin Luther
Probably promoting the need for boosters
I always wonder why they don't worry about their own health? Though there's no injection mandate to work at the CDC as Rochelle Walensky admitted in live testimony before Congress, still, she has three children and must have good friends and family members that she would be concerned about? But it goes way beyond her as we know. So many medical professionals know what's going on but also know that if they speak up they risk losing their job. I just had a long conversation with patient relations at Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates in Boston about this. They basically admitted that they have to go along with whatever the CDC decides.
Is there a link to the actual report? I need to show this to my sons college....they want to force this unnecessary vax
Yes, the link to the NEJM report is above. Have you heard of this group? https://nocollegemandates.com/about/
Is this actually a news event? That natural immunity is superior -- and that it's actually a thing? That injecting lipid nanoparticles and other trash makes no sense?? "Medicine" and "science" have disgraced themselves to a point of non-recovery, IMO.
Good overview JD Thank You
We must support Senator Rand Paul in his quest to bring justice to Tony Fauci, md. His work in funding (with US taxpayer monies) a PRC lab with (USA) illegal research should be cause for some jail time. This is not to mention his funding of the use experimental aid medicines onthose 85 +/- little black children orphans in NY in 2005 should be brought to light. He is a monster hiding as a public servant/spokesperson. Plus, his approval of funding for the 30+ illegal biowar labs in Ukraine is more than sufficient for a strong legal charge.
So I'm listening to a group of intelligence agents talk about we are in a CCP bio war on the Bannon war room. but what I don't get is-that if this is a CCP lead war why did the US block access to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for viral illnesses? US government Denyed these safe drugs is inconsistent with a CCP only war on the US population.
I DO NOT contend that the Vax's are Safe and Effective !
e.g., https://timellison.substack.com/p/follow-up-on-the-the-follow-the-science-67d
HOWEVER, this article is very misleading:
Firstly, you are comparing:
Vax'd
to
Un-Vaxed WITH PREVIOUS INFECTION AND NATURAL IMMUNITY.
Secondly, the Expose article is also VERY misleading. While it is true that the most-vax'd are the most-hospitalized-and-dead, most people who die are very old, and the very old are vax'd at the 99% percent level in CA, where as the younger folks at less than the 85% level. We shall consequently see the Vax'd dying at higher rates than the Un-Vax'd for any reason, all the time !
I am NOT saying the Vax's are Safe and Effective, and even if effective to some extent against CoVid, that does not mean they they don't increase your chance of dying. HOWEVER, articles such as this and the Expose article leave the camp fighting against the Vax open to a world of criticism.
Be careful of jumping to conclusions.
The article reads like "more vaxx=more infected" is a bug. It's not. It's a feature.
We are now under constant threat of the return of the bogus mitigations efforts that ruined our economy and harmed so many people. The state's response to rising infection rates? "Get vaxxed." But if getting vaxxed results in more infections, this plays right into the state's hands. Vaxx and boost enough people and you could drive up the infection rate to a point where the state will respond as if the pandemic is still in the pre-vaccine stage.
Yet Trudeau keeps insisting on the jab.
Is EVERYBODY here unable to think for themselves?
1) Nobody, including the article writer, asked what percentage of the population is vaccinated. 85% of the Canadian population is vaccinated. So 15% is not. 30% of the deaths are from unvaccinated people. So guess what - you’re twice as likely to die if you’re not vaxxed.
2) “natural immunity” means having had Covid. OF COURSE the antibodies from having had real Covid are better at protecting the body from the vaccines. But guess what, that’s if you don’t die from Covid first if not vaxxed.
Any other questions?
So, you ACTUALLY think you just refuted a peer-reviewed article in the New England Journal of Medicine? ffs, they normalized the data to be a rate per 100k. BASIC STUFF, Cinderella.
[insert emoji of dude in white suit laughing].
fyi - the death rate among 3 jabbed was 70% of the total, but they are <50% of the population - so how does that work out?
Moreover, the unjabbed calc is false - it relies on using the census from almost 10 years ago and subtracting out the known vaxxed to get the 'unvaxxed' population. But that is WRONG because the demographics have changed.
finally, people are counted as unjabbed until 2 weeks AFTER the shot. FRAUD, baby!
What misterkel said, plus what about all cause mortality? Is it reduced post vaccination? (Pfizer’s own data suggests not.) You can’t die from Covid if you died of something else after vaccination.
I think a lot of the unvaxed include street people, druggies, etc. who are poorly nourished and not in good health. Some end up in hospital for drug overdose. They may be Covid positive, and if thry are, I believe their deaths are still attributed to Covid. Personally, I do not think it has been proven that the vaxes do much at all.
No matter what their angle in finally acknowledging some truth, there is no excuse for the denials, the demonization of ethical scientists and physicians who have been telling the truth, and the outright lies and subterfuge involved in serving their Pharma beast god.
Yes, it's good that admissions are finally being made by the bastards. But I can't even verbalize the simmering rage I feel over all of this.
Before I had even heard about vaccine injury, New York Times ( https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine.html ), had this article, and a few others promoting the vaccine. Essentially the mRNA contains an "instruction script" that gives a command to our cells to create and express a spike protein.
I had seen Gates promoting universal vaccines for years before covid, and Microsoft has forced upgrades on our pc - even against our wishes, as they reconfigure the pc as they see fit.
NYT promoted this a great achievement, but I seen it as very very dangerous to let give someone else the keys to our bodies.
That was my first flag, and with some investigating, I stumbled across Dr. Carrie Madej, and from there so much more. All of the warnings she had discussed are truly coming to light now.
Remember when Moderna had the webpage talking about your cells as the 'operating system' and their jabs as the 'software of life'? If anyone can find that webpage, I would really appreciate it.
Hey LOA,
I never heard of that, but a quick search on "software of life using" this search engine
https://www.virtualmirage.org/
gives a huge list of what you described. I had a career programing PCs to robots, and when I saw what NYT described it freaked me out.
Here is the top link:
https://www.biospace.com/article/moderna-harnesses-the-power-of-amazon-web-services-to-develop-personalized-medicines/
That was close so thank you! I found part of the image in Moderna's filing to the SEC. Scroll down about 3 pages. It seems Moderna scrubbed this image from its website.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285219000009/moderna10-k12312018.htm
You are such liars! These shots do nothing but cause more illness and death. I know first hand from many people. You try to debunk TRUTH and call it lies!
No... Not to get ahead of the virus... not to assuage a guilty conscience (they have no such guilty conscience). Why then? The only viable reason I've heard so far, from JD Rucker himself i believe, is to set the stage for blaming President Trump. Our President did the right thing based on the info he and all others had, and pushed thru development of vaccines like no one could thought possible -- but now it might be claimed that Trump was reckless in doing so, because the rush meant entirely insufficient testing etc. and now it's caused a serious problem of people dying prematurely.
Of course, as always, such blame would be an utter lie, but many of the same people who screamed the most at those not complying with mask "mandates", etc, would likely get on that band wagon, too.
Having read the source paper it says nothing of the sort. What it actually says in Table 2 is that 2 doses is highly effective against serious infection (97% against Omicron BA1 and 77% against Omicron BA2), but that after six months effectness against mild infection is effectively zero. The summary in the New England Journal of Medicine is shockingly bad and seems to have been written to grab a headline.