21 Comments
User's avatar
Brett Read's avatar

Thank you for your tireless work and research JD. Targeted bioweapons are a serious threat and as you have warned, the best defense is not to disclose your DNA to anyone.

Ness's avatar

Why is no one mentioning the PCR tests? Who do you think for all those swabs with millions of peoples DNA ? This is already a done deal .. they have it all already

Phoebe's avatar

I was going to ask the same question. I'm certainly glad I never submitted to to any of those PCR tests. Of course, I've had enough blood work done in the past so that my DNA has always been available to the authorities. Hey, if they want to get your DNA, there's always some of it lying around., right? Still, I always suspected that the unprecedentedly obsessive testing of the general public had even more goals than inflating the "case" numbers and making people into paranoid hypochondriacs.

Barbara's avatar

Yes my thoughts too I agree with you both This must be so

Ness's avatar

I find it odd that JD didn't mention this in his article .. very odd..

Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

I was surprised that RAT tests were okayed as that DNA doesn't go anywhere.

RATS are money making and maybe there's something on the nose swab that we don't actually want in our lungs.

NU's avatar

I regret sending my saliva to Ancestry dot com 10+ years ago. Can't do much about it now but can avoid sharing my genetic code from here on out.

Just me's avatar

You can download your DNA Data for your personal use, Then delete your DNA from the site. If the company was going to use it nefariously, they already have. However, every 6 months or so, they update your DNA Profile using newly developed technology for the Traits Program. No reason to leave your markers there.

Paul Ashley's avatar

The last two Bond movies, written before all of this COVID insanity hit, were about the WHO and pharma and DNA targeted bioweapons. Apparently the evil has been afoot and known of by some for quite some time.

Mesmer's avatar

Hmmm, in light of the government attacks on farms in an attempt to destroy the food supply, I find it interesting that they are warning about using bioweapons to attack... ... ... the food supply. This is where we will see it first, no doubt.

They really do want us dead in as painful a manner as possible don't they?

Thanks for shining a light on this JD.

Ruth H's avatar

As a gift, I sent in kit to Ancestry.com and was amazed at the results pinpointing my parents’ origins. Unfortunately I have come to realize the risk. I don’t share anymore information on their link.

Thanks for your article regarding bioweapons. So true about China but I’m to the point of not trusting my own government to do some targeting.

Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

Our DNA is all sent to the Chicoms.

Jayne Doe's avatar

Denied a genetic request in 2002. Knew innately it would be used neferiously. And now here we are. I just knew it.

Bob L's avatar

Amen, I have been suspicious about those DNA ancestry things simply for privacy, but I never considered what you mentioned.

Sharon Wood's avatar

Dr. Chetty, South Africa, said he saw that with each variant. First, blacks, then Asians then whites & muslims. He knew bc that is how they came to him for treatment. He is well-respected and credible.

Lizzy_D's avatar

I was always suspicious about those ancestry tests mostly for privacy, but as others have mentioned, the bioweapon angle never occurred to me. Figures. Anyway, I was not all that impressed with the findings of those tests anyway. They are general to a fault and inherently can’t be any more than educated guesses.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 25, 2022
Comment deleted
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Good point Dogslife about the comparison aspect of the DNA from successive tests.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 27, 2022
Comment deleted
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Such a massive experiment must be being monitored, but they would need to know who got what clotshot.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Some contracts with Fizzer specifically forbid batch serialisation.

So that's why I'm not seeing it as a finely grained experiment.