57 Comments

Yet another major event from over 100 years ago that we still do not have the truth about.

Expand full comment

Like 9/11....

Expand full comment

Oh, we have the truth about 9/11.

It's just that the ZOG-programmed slaves in this country can't seem to grasp the possibility that "Israel" did it. When you contrast it with the USS Liberty, however...

Expand full comment

Please explain more. So, what did Israel mistake the Twin Towers for on 9/11? We lost men on that USS Liberty incident :-(

Expand full comment

Please explain more. So, why do you run disinformation, straw man questions for the Zogs? 🤔

Expand full comment

What are you talking about? Screw that word disinformation. Something is either the

truth or a lie period.

Expand full comment

So, where did letmepicyou say anything about mistaking the towers for?🤔

Aka as your straw man argument and disinformation/lie. 😉

Expand full comment

Remember the Maine!

Expand full comment

The Titanic wasn't the boat that sunk, it was it's damaged sister ship the Olympic. On board were many wealthy elites that opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve. JP Morgan was supposed to be on the maiden voyage but cancelled "sick" at the last minute. There's information about this around the net including a very thorough youtube documentary.

Expand full comment

This disaster was faked just as the moon landings were faked.

Neither the Olympic nor the Titanic rest on the ocean floor.

An excellent theory by Miles Mathis entitled

THE TITANIC: The Fraud that Keeps on Giving

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=172526

Expand full comment

Mathis also points out the odd lighting in the supposed photos of the titanic on the ocean floor. Lit like a Hollywood stage despite being 12,500 feet down where it is totally dark. Can a tiny robot submersible cast enough light to light the entire hunk of ship? And how was the Frenchman going down all those times? In what? Are there other passenger submersibles going down and into the wreck to salvage?

And how that is not really an iceberg area, so far south into Gulf Stream.

Miles suggests the submersible story is intended to bolster the myth of the titanic. All OceanGate (even the name sounds like a scandal) did for me was make me question the entire titanic story.

Expand full comment

This fake “Oceangate” disaster took several years to plan. Possibly to resell the Titanic fake, and at the same time cash out life insurance policies on some elite billionaires needing to escape impending legal trouble by “perishing” and retiring with new identities. But who knows for certain as these people are extremely clever.

Expand full comment

This disaster was faked just as the moon landings were faked.

Neither the Olympic nor the Titanic rest on the ocean floor.

An excellent theory by Miles Mathis entitled

THE TITANIC: The Fraud that Keeps on Giving

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=172526

Expand full comment

Ah, I just left a similar comment. You beat me to it. Everyone should check out the documentary. Others have "debunked" it, but I don't know. The engine room crew walking off the ship is very interesting.

Expand full comment

I heard the same thing!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks, great film.

Expand full comment

Yes, that's the one:)

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2023Liked by JD Rucker

JD- great connections between both the Titanic story, Biden mafia distraction, and the potential destruction of the submersible to prevent detection of the FedReserve schema. Very interesting back story ("theory") on the Titanic with puzzle pieces that seem to fit together. Many of JP Morgan’s “opponents” went down in the Titanic. Didn’t JP Morgan also insure the Titanic beyond what it was worth?? And he did not put his art collection on it, but allowed hundreds of other artworks to be deep sixed (which made his pieces all the more valuable). Incredible payout. FedReserve enemies squashed. Collectibles increased. J.P. Morgan seems to have had much to gain from the sinking of the “unsinkable ship” which had a hull thicker than modern icebreakers and yet was sunk (reportedly) by an iceberg. Who owned the presses?? Another Fed Reservist?

And what ambition drove Paul-Henri Nargeolet, the ancestor of a Titanic passenger, to become a bomb expert and hunt down the ship and explore it endlessly (37 times)?? Was he EXPECTING to find evidence of an explosion? Are we sure that he "embarked" on this expedition, or were these various people just laid into their submersible coffin and conveniently buried at sea?

One could also ask why the ship (Titanic) was named after Titan, and was sunk by Luciferian (Zeus-iferian) sun(day)-worshippers. Was this an advertisement of their world power and control? Of Jupiter rising? And was the soon-to-be pursuit of technocracy chosen as a means to revive Rome (the dragon church-state) which returned from its "head wound" through Mussolini?

Expand full comment

It's interesting, perhaps of no significance, but the name Paul-Henri rang a bell. Princess Diana's chauffeur on the night of her death, was Henri Paul. Your comment "what ambition drove Paul-Henri..." brought it to mind. Reminds me of the flipped names of Lincoln-Kennedy secretaries. It does seen like they toy with the overwhelming gullibility of the public at large....Laughing all the way to the bank.

Expand full comment

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and I've always just Accepted the story of the Titanic as true.. Or,at least it wasn't Done to forward some agenda,,and Now it's looking like a lot of people died for The Banksters, again. Is anything actually what it looks like on the surface?

Expand full comment

No. Nothing mainstream or with lots of eyes on it ..

Expand full comment

There is another issue that has floated about in the years ago event, and that is J. P. Morgan switched the Olympic and Titanic names, as the Olympic was unsound for poor hull issues. The issue of the Federal Reserve is correct. Taft said publically that he would veto a Federal Reserve Bill, so the Baruche, JP Morgan, Rockefeller, and Schiff ( Wall Street ) had to defeat him. The election of Woodrow Wilson was pre-ordained by the mebers gaining agreement with Wilson on several possible decisions he might have to make. Once that agreement, JP Morgan funded the Bull Moose Campaign of T. Roosevelt entirely ( splitter ) snd the group bought up 159-60 News Corporations, and featured Wilson news, on threat of closure. This is not the only time. The reason this might suprise one, is because many have without judgement accepted corrupt information for many years if not all their life.

Expand full comment

It brings out of the shadows the titanic narrative into the public realm

The titanic story scrutinised with un-schooled eyes

Blows up the old story

All the old stories need to be revisited

Drip drip drip

FLOOD

Expand full comment

The international conspiracy theorist storytime competition. Of course, infiltrated by CIA and banker spies to spin stories with plausible stories that can be debunked so that everyone's REAL conspiracy theories are equally debunked.

Or as Huey, Louie and Dewie (duck) would say, "Please, Unca Donald! Tell us another story!"

Expand full comment

Oh my, when I heard the news I said to my hubby “I don’t trust the news. We will probably find out there is more to this than what they are saying”.

Expand full comment

The rule of thumb about past events: If Hollywood made a movie about it, and it won awards, you have to know that it is false. The Titanic sunk by an iceberg is really the Olympia sunk by explosives.

Expand full comment

it amazes me that what i think i see you write, me the no brainer who only collects dots but so many dots here. I think you are spot on. NONE of it made sense from the get go soon as i read they had many problem issues. then i turned to Why? Thank you Mr JD Rucker, have a great eve all and be safe

Expand full comment

I love it!!

Expand full comment

There are some good Titanic conspiracy documentaries. My favorite is the Titanic had a sister ship almost identical twin called the Olympic. The Olympic collided with a destroyer causing serious damage. It would need 6 months of repairs and was listing towards one side. White Star Lines owned by JP Morgan, who in turn was financed by the Rothschilds was losing money and didn't want to pay for the repair. They switched the Olympic and Titanic names over the course of a weekend. They then sank the ship for the insurance money and took out some Anti Fed people at the same time. The USS California was waiting empty in the middle of the Ocean for no particularly good reason. It missed the distress call and was late to the scene. The engine room crew walked off the ship and had to be replaced. For some reason. Many witnesses were sworn to secrecy by the crown. Who knows, but something is very strange about the Titanic going down.

Expand full comment

Possibly on target. I can see why conspiracies are floating around about Titanic and now OceanGate. Don’t forget the obvious name....don’t all conspiracies end with gate and usually are true.

Expand full comment

Kate Dalley also spoke of this on one of her shows. There are many discrepancies concerning the original sinking. She mentioned something about the Carpathia stories being off also.

Expand full comment

3 years ago, I would have believed the news reports about this incident. I don't now. I don't know what to believe, but I'm pretty sure the MSM is spoon feeding me a narrative.

Expand full comment

I like the way your thinking Rucker

Expand full comment

Icebreakers break up pack ice not icebergs.

Expand full comment