For those of us who have been keeping track of "vaccine" data, the only shocking part of this video is that Pfizer is finally admitting to what we knew all along.
PureBlood here. I was harassed, badgered, threatened with violence, called horrific names, lost friends and family, blocked on social media, banned from some social media….. I’m alive and proud I see through the lies mankind will do to fellow humans for greed and suffering of others.
They got a shot that does nothing except destroy their futures and I get the future of taxation and demands I fund their poor decisions, just like a college loan.
And the Moderna and Pfizer bivalent boosters are going before cdc this month for EU approval for 5-11 year olds!! This must stop now!! We need to ride up and put an end to it now!!!
Mr Rucker, I try to read all your posts which are excellent.
However listen again to the twitter of the exchange between the Danish parliament official and the Pfizer director. He asked if the vaccine was "...tested on stopping the transmission of the virus ..." Yes or No? AND he asked at the same time " if not ... if yes .... are you willing ..."
Asking 2 questions at once is classic for questioning Fauci by Rand Paul. Fauci always weaseled out of the Yes or No, sometimes by indirectly answering the other. And Mr Paul almost never got a one word answer -- a master psychopathic response. So the Pfizer official jumped on the opportunity. Notice her apparently referring to documents on her desk, perhaps planned responses to expected questions. She said clear as day "... did we know about stopping the immunization ...?" No one word answer. And the "answer" does not seem to include whether they will share data. We all read this rapidly with great glee that the truth has finally come out. What does "stopping the immunization mean -- nothing. You could say she meant " stopping the transmission of the virus," which was what was asked. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT SHE SAID. What she said makes no sense. What did she mean? Stopping the whole jabbing program? I doubt. Otherwise the sentence makes no sense. Did she misspeak? We can wait for her correction, which will be a long wait. They tricked the world again. A skilled lawyer would only ask one question at a time, and hammer until it is answered. An impatient questioner piles on his follow-on question which gives the person questioned a perfect opportunity to obfuscate. Pfizer sent the right person. We lost again.
Great point to mention -- it might be OK if these definitions of immunization are accurate https://www.wordnik.com/words/immunization "The process by which an individual is exposed to a material that is designed to prime his or her immune system against that material."
Their trial data from Dec 2020 showed people in the vaccinated group DID get Cvd so they never proved it stopped one from getting it and therefore never proved it stop one from spreading it.
That stupid court in Australia ordered Novak Djokovic deported from the country, preventing him from defending his title in the Australian Open Tennis Championships, because he had not been vaccinated. And that is only one of the millions of injustices that have been perpegtrated by the guilty proponents of these fraudulent vaccines.
Imagine you were taken to a horse race and told you had to bet your life on the horse which won that race, if your horse did not win, then you would die. So the race favorite was a horse with an impressive 99.16% win record, it had never lost a race and the slowest horse in the race, which had never won a race was also the slowest with an 0.89% chance of winning - so which horse would you choose to win the race for you and save your life? So why did you all choose the slowest horse in the race, according to The Lancet: Covid 99.16% Pfizer 0.89% and you all chose Pfizer!! The other horses in the race, J&J, Astrazeneca, etc had ratings between 0.89% and 1.5% (Astrazeneca) - now you can see that the vaccines were never about Covid, they were about injecting each of you with 99% Graphene Oxide and nanotechnology and parasites - and you really don't want to know what happens when Graphene Oxide is changed into Graphene Hydroxide, or if that is possible, by a 5G signal!!
Sen. Ron Johnson: Plandemic Politics & America’s Covid Cartel.
Schizer Vice President admits live that there is no established relationship between quackcine induced antibodies (proven non-neutralizing!) and infection, disease, transmission or death prevention/ reduction.
Safe & Defective (Immunization) = Scientific Fraud of the Century!!!.
The MP asked her if Pfizer had tested the vaccine for stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market.
She answered, "Did we know about stopping immunization before it sent (sic) to market? No!"
She didn't answer the MP's question, and her reply makes no sense anyway. Later, she can say that she misunderstood the question and had a brain fart. Very deceptive.
For a while, I tried to express sympathy for those who believed vaccines "saved lives." They were brain-washed, after all. But now, my patience is gone. If you can't learn to think for yourself, then adios.
"Did we know about stopping the immunization before it entered the market?" That is NOT his question! Her answer is gibberish. She says "Immunization" instead of "transmission" rendering the response a semantic chaos. It does, however, avoid answering the question. So I guess it's a success. Her boss, Albert Borlau, HAS said that it does not stop transmission.
She said, "Did we know about stopping IMMUNIZATION before it entered the market . . . " That's not the same as saying they didn't know about stopping TRANSMISSION. This could be Pfizer's way of twisting the subject, or am I missing something?
I had a conversation recently with a young woman who was very much abortion-choice. When she brought up bodily autonomy, I asked her if she was in favor of jab mandates for the covid shot? Oh yes, everyone should get it. I said, "wow, the cognitive dissonance in your brain must be overwhelming!"
I might be wrong but I've never seen a Pfizer employee, or Pfizer advertisement anywhere in the media that they claimed the vaccine stopped transmission.
President Biden, VP Harris, Fauci, NIH, CDC, FDA, and other federal government officials, made that claim along with many state officials, but never Pfizer?
If you know of some Pfizer claim they made, please provide the document, video, etc., I'll bet you can't find one? You might find speculation and here say but that all's.
Not only not tested--they were planned by DOD (hundreds of patents licensed) to kill us all--here's one of many interviews by brave "How Bad Is My Batch" whistleblower Sasha Latypova:
What if you could save one life by sharing this article? Imagine.
done multiple times over - infuriating
PureBlood here. I was harassed, badgered, threatened with violence, called horrific names, lost friends and family, blocked on social media, banned from some social media….. I’m alive and proud I see through the lies mankind will do to fellow humans for greed and suffering of others.
They got a shot that does nothing except destroy their futures and I get the future of taxation and demands I fund their poor decisions, just like a college loan.
Trust what science again?
The "speed of science"???
Yeah, seriously, eh?
This was fraud. This should strip the Pharma companies of their liability sheild.
And the Moderna and Pfizer bivalent boosters are going before cdc this month for EU approval for 5-11 year olds!! This must stop now!! We need to ride up and put an end to it now!!!
Mr Rucker, I try to read all your posts which are excellent.
However listen again to the twitter of the exchange between the Danish parliament official and the Pfizer director. He asked if the vaccine was "...tested on stopping the transmission of the virus ..." Yes or No? AND he asked at the same time " if not ... if yes .... are you willing ..."
Asking 2 questions at once is classic for questioning Fauci by Rand Paul. Fauci always weaseled out of the Yes or No, sometimes by indirectly answering the other. And Mr Paul almost never got a one word answer -- a master psychopathic response. So the Pfizer official jumped on the opportunity. Notice her apparently referring to documents on her desk, perhaps planned responses to expected questions. She said clear as day "... did we know about stopping the immunization ...?" No one word answer. And the "answer" does not seem to include whether they will share data. We all read this rapidly with great glee that the truth has finally come out. What does "stopping the immunization mean -- nothing. You could say she meant " stopping the transmission of the virus," which was what was asked. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT SHE SAID. What she said makes no sense. What did she mean? Stopping the whole jabbing program? I doubt. Otherwise the sentence makes no sense. Did she misspeak? We can wait for her correction, which will be a long wait. They tricked the world again. A skilled lawyer would only ask one question at a time, and hammer until it is answered. An impatient questioner piles on his follow-on question which gives the person questioned a perfect opportunity to obfuscate. Pfizer sent the right person. We lost again.
Yes, I was wondering about that. I had the feeling she was talking about transmission, but I can't be 100% certain of that.
In my glee, I went with the conclusion that the tweet implied.
Thanks for pointing this out.
I want to credit others saw this flaw first, altho I did not read other comments before firing off mine. "Great minds think alike"
Great point to mention -- it might be OK if these definitions of immunization are accurate https://www.wordnik.com/words/immunization "The process by which an individual is exposed to a material that is designed to prime his or her immune system against that material."
Their trial data from Dec 2020 showed people in the vaccinated group DID get Cvd so they never proved it stopped one from getting it and therefore never proved it stop one from spreading it.
Using their data end points (7 or more days after the 2nd dose), it only reduced one's chance of getting it by 1%, that's it. https://rumble.com/vobcg5-relative-vs-absolute-risk-reduction.html
That stupid court in Australia ordered Novak Djokovic deported from the country, preventing him from defending his title in the Australian Open Tennis Championships, because he had not been vaccinated. And that is only one of the millions of injustices that have been perpegtrated by the guilty proponents of these fraudulent vaccines.
Imagine you were taken to a horse race and told you had to bet your life on the horse which won that race, if your horse did not win, then you would die. So the race favorite was a horse with an impressive 99.16% win record, it had never lost a race and the slowest horse in the race, which had never won a race was also the slowest with an 0.89% chance of winning - so which horse would you choose to win the race for you and save your life? So why did you all choose the slowest horse in the race, according to The Lancet: Covid 99.16% Pfizer 0.89% and you all chose Pfizer!! The other horses in the race, J&J, Astrazeneca, etc had ratings between 0.89% and 1.5% (Astrazeneca) - now you can see that the vaccines were never about Covid, they were about injecting each of you with 99% Graphene Oxide and nanotechnology and parasites - and you really don't want to know what happens when Graphene Oxide is changed into Graphene Hydroxide, or if that is possible, by a 5G signal!!
Sen. Ron Johnson: Plandemic Politics & America’s Covid Cartel.
Schizer Vice President admits live that there is no established relationship between quackcine induced antibodies (proven non-neutralizing!) and infection, disease, transmission or death prevention/ reduction.
Safe & Defective (Immunization) = Scientific Fraud of the Century!!!.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/sen-ron-johnson-pandemic-politics-americas-covid-cartel/
Company Linked to CIA Now Making mRNA for Moderna’s Reformulated COVID Booster Shots
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cia-linked-mrna-moderna-omicron-covid-booster-shot/
No, her answer was non-responsive gobbledegook.
The MP asked her if Pfizer had tested the vaccine for stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market.
She answered, "Did we know about stopping immunization before it sent (sic) to market? No!"
She didn't answer the MP's question, and her reply makes no sense anyway. Later, she can say that she misunderstood the question and had a brain fart. Very deceptive.
For a while, I tried to express sympathy for those who believed vaccines "saved lives." They were brain-washed, after all. But now, my patience is gone. If you can't learn to think for yourself, then adios.
"Did we know about stopping the immunization before it entered the market?" That is NOT his question! Her answer is gibberish. She says "Immunization" instead of "transmission" rendering the response a semantic chaos. It does, however, avoid answering the question. So I guess it's a success. Her boss, Albert Borlau, HAS said that it does not stop transmission.
She said, "Did we know about stopping IMMUNIZATION before it entered the market . . . " That's not the same as saying they didn't know about stopping TRANSMISSION. This could be Pfizer's way of twisting the subject, or am I missing something?
You caught it right, but I believe she just misspoke. His question was crystal clear and her answer was, "No."
Lets hope so; thanks.
I had a conversation recently with a young woman who was very much abortion-choice. When she brought up bodily autonomy, I asked her if she was in favor of jab mandates for the covid shot? Oh yes, everyone should get it. I said, "wow, the cognitive dissonance in your brain must be overwhelming!"
I might be wrong but I've never seen a Pfizer employee, or Pfizer advertisement anywhere in the media that they claimed the vaccine stopped transmission.
President Biden, VP Harris, Fauci, NIH, CDC, FDA, and other federal government officials, made that claim along with many state officials, but never Pfizer?
If you know of some Pfizer claim they made, please provide the document, video, etc., I'll bet you can't find one? You might find speculation and here say but that all's.
Not only not tested--they were planned by DOD (hundreds of patents licensed) to kill us all--here's one of many interviews by brave "How Bad Is My Batch" whistleblower Sasha Latypova:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/09/proof-dod-using-100s-of-pharma-to-scale-up-mass-genocide-against-americans/
Sorry this one's a black pill but she documents it all REALLY well...