The marketplace of ideas is only possible when ideas that go against the mainstream are allowed. On sites like Twitter and Facebook, that just isn't possible. Substack is a wonderful exception.
Offensive vs. Death causing, there is a difference to me. Real doctors are literally breaking down crying, begging for this jab to stop. This is not about FREE SPEECH, this is about a lack of science and a desire to push us into being completely controlled, by allowing those with MD in front of their name to warp minds. Hitler had many helpers, and still does. Stand up for humanity now or lose the chance.
It is ALWAYS about free speech. No matter what. That was and is a foundational principle of our country. The whole introduction of the category 'hate speech' opened the door for censorship, which is what you are advocating. You must beat those you disagree with with words anchored in logic, truth and virtue.
Love the Rucker....! However, to mention, I am still waiting for Substack to get rid of Eric Topol, gotta say it every chance I get. He is still recommending jabs last I checked about 2 weeks ago. Undefendable ever, esp. now. Then I would feel right about publishing on Substack. Free speech, yes. Propping killing lies, (with a sponsored writers position no less), no. No offense intended, but please let me know if he goes. I can't even stand to see his site, where you can't comment, obviously. I am fine with Substack publishing things I simply do not like, but sponsoring that guy is something else entirely. Best to you...and best to the true scientists and journalists on Substack. I hope Substack wakes up to the difference between free speech and true damage to lives, by sponsoring Schill Topol. Was it some kind of deal?
Unfortunately, if you put freedom itself above content, it is to Substack’s credit that they allow Topol. I subscribe to see what lies he’s peddling and trying to justify with long algorithms and data interpretations. I love to see what that side is doing.
Tolerating opinions you hate is tantamount to everything else in a truly free society. Honestly if Substack started banning authors based on content, I think it would be tragic.
Thanks AL....Is recommending the jab, still, a form of hate speech? Its proven to be killing folks. Is there any distinction between jab propaganda and a countering opinion? I think tolerating pharma shills are core to the problem, all cause death up up up and he is still allowed to prop the jab, fingers in ears? I dunno, seems a bad allowance to me. Every time you look at his sight you are likely making him or Substack money from THAT site, which to me is reprehensible on some level. Stop helping him. You already know what he is saying.
The issue of freedom is so much bigger than this. If we use your logic, who gets to decide what is right or wrong speech (hate speech or otherwise)? That is the problem we have now, where the people with power have decided that all of us who disclose dangers of the vax are "dangerous to our democracy." What you are describing is something that needs to stop, not because it is bad speech but because it is a crime. We don't want a "freedom of crime" society, but we do need complete open discourse of ideas, even if they are offensive.
I am here for including the simply offensive or random ideologists ALL DAY LONG, what I am NOT here for is when advice is given that literally KILLS people, perpetuates these poison jabs. Do you see a difference? If Soros or Harari or any open WEF member joined the 'Substack' Community, closed off their comments when they were uncomfortable (as did Shill Topol), and espoused more Homoborgiensis making, you would be all for it in the name of free speech then? AL, who are you?
Get off your soap box Jacquelyn. Free speech is not reserved only for "random ideologists."
Most people do not understand the basic tenets of free speech. What free speech means to them, and apparently to you, is "I get to say whatever I want because I'm right and the people I disagree with do not!" Take it away from them and they'll take it away from you.
Hopefully you can see the trouble with that sanctimonious stance.
George Orwell said, “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." Harry S. Truman said, "“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." The minute you decide who gets to say what, we are all doomed. That stance will be used against you as quickly as you used it against someone else.
My own doctors, including a very "good" cardiologist, believe that this vax is amazing. That's what they tell people-the express their opinion in contrast to yours that the vax is killing people. I agree that it's killing people. But so is depression, cancer, smoking, driving too fast and about a million other things. I disagree with him and tell him why. Clearly, we are reading very different things. But the only way to truly live in a free society is to allow the FULL discourse--otherwise people will never know the truth. They certainly won't know it just because YOU or a random slew of doctors says it. The truth needs to out on its own. I get that you're frustrated, and it may take time, and in that time, people are dying--but that's no different than any other time in history. Deliberate lies that kill people are crimes--they aren't protected by "free speech." But those are two different things--don't confuse them. Whatever you use against them to limit speech will be used against you--as we have clearly seen re: social media's treatment of "anti-vaxxers." Better to have it all out in the open.
Oh, you are vaxxed and boosted. I see. Many are sick and dying from the effects, will you be one?. Your Doc is a shill as well, if they continue to recommend this death jab. The jabbed have no functional innate immune system, so anything can take you out. Sorry.
Excellent. Loved her tweets! I enjoy my time here so much more with intelligent, thinking people than the hateful individuals on Twitter. I no longer waste time there.
Love it!
Offensive vs. Death causing, there is a difference to me. Real doctors are literally breaking down crying, begging for this jab to stop. This is not about FREE SPEECH, this is about a lack of science and a desire to push us into being completely controlled, by allowing those with MD in front of their name to warp minds. Hitler had many helpers, and still does. Stand up for humanity now or lose the chance.
It is ALWAYS about free speech. No matter what. That was and is a foundational principle of our country. The whole introduction of the category 'hate speech' opened the door for censorship, which is what you are advocating. You must beat those you disagree with with words anchored in logic, truth and virtue.
troll link
Love the Rucker....! However, to mention, I am still waiting for Substack to get rid of Eric Topol, gotta say it every chance I get. He is still recommending jabs last I checked about 2 weeks ago. Undefendable ever, esp. now. Then I would feel right about publishing on Substack. Free speech, yes. Propping killing lies, (with a sponsored writers position no less), no. No offense intended, but please let me know if he goes. I can't even stand to see his site, where you can't comment, obviously. I am fine with Substack publishing things I simply do not like, but sponsoring that guy is something else entirely. Best to you...and best to the true scientists and journalists on Substack. I hope Substack wakes up to the difference between free speech and true damage to lives, by sponsoring Schill Topol. Was it some kind of deal?
Unfortunately, if you put freedom itself above content, it is to Substack’s credit that they allow Topol. I subscribe to see what lies he’s peddling and trying to justify with long algorithms and data interpretations. I love to see what that side is doing.
Tolerating opinions you hate is tantamount to everything else in a truly free society. Honestly if Substack started banning authors based on content, I think it would be tragic.
Thanks AL....Is recommending the jab, still, a form of hate speech? Its proven to be killing folks. Is there any distinction between jab propaganda and a countering opinion? I think tolerating pharma shills are core to the problem, all cause death up up up and he is still allowed to prop the jab, fingers in ears? I dunno, seems a bad allowance to me. Every time you look at his sight you are likely making him or Substack money from THAT site, which to me is reprehensible on some level. Stop helping him. You already know what he is saying.
The issue of freedom is so much bigger than this. If we use your logic, who gets to decide what is right or wrong speech (hate speech or otherwise)? That is the problem we have now, where the people with power have decided that all of us who disclose dangers of the vax are "dangerous to our democracy." What you are describing is something that needs to stop, not because it is bad speech but because it is a crime. We don't want a "freedom of crime" society, but we do need complete open discourse of ideas, even if they are offensive.
I am here for including the simply offensive or random ideologists ALL DAY LONG, what I am NOT here for is when advice is given that literally KILLS people, perpetuates these poison jabs. Do you see a difference? If Soros or Harari or any open WEF member joined the 'Substack' Community, closed off their comments when they were uncomfortable (as did Shill Topol), and espoused more Homoborgiensis making, you would be all for it in the name of free speech then? AL, who are you?
Get off your soap box Jacquelyn. Free speech is not reserved only for "random ideologists."
Most people do not understand the basic tenets of free speech. What free speech means to them, and apparently to you, is "I get to say whatever I want because I'm right and the people I disagree with do not!" Take it away from them and they'll take it away from you.
Hopefully you can see the trouble with that sanctimonious stance.
George Orwell said, “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." Harry S. Truman said, "“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." The minute you decide who gets to say what, we are all doomed. That stance will be used against you as quickly as you used it against someone else.
My own doctors, including a very "good" cardiologist, believe that this vax is amazing. That's what they tell people-the express their opinion in contrast to yours that the vax is killing people. I agree that it's killing people. But so is depression, cancer, smoking, driving too fast and about a million other things. I disagree with him and tell him why. Clearly, we are reading very different things. But the only way to truly live in a free society is to allow the FULL discourse--otherwise people will never know the truth. They certainly won't know it just because YOU or a random slew of doctors says it. The truth needs to out on its own. I get that you're frustrated, and it may take time, and in that time, people are dying--but that's no different than any other time in history. Deliberate lies that kill people are crimes--they aren't protected by "free speech." But those are two different things--don't confuse them. Whatever you use against them to limit speech will be used against you--as we have clearly seen re: social media's treatment of "anti-vaxxers." Better to have it all out in the open.
Oh, you are vaxxed and boosted. I see. Many are sick and dying from the effects, will you be one?. Your Doc is a shill as well, if they continue to recommend this death jab. The jabbed have no functional innate immune system, so anything can take you out. Sorry.
Excellent. Loved her tweets! I enjoy my time here so much more with intelligent, thinking people than the hateful individuals on Twitter. I no longer waste time there.
J. Mulholland is a satire writer. He fooled many with his tweet.