Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Connecting The Dots's avatar

Great observation JD.

We collectively are idiots and deserve this on some level.

It is maddening to see the masses...flock like moths to a flame - every time something "new, shiny, innovative" - is rolled out for the slobbering collective.

The AI chats are a perfect example..."oh how fun to make the stupid AI bot, spit out crazy answers or ones that prove they are just toys at best and not smarter than us..."

No one ever learns...everything they do, especially in tech, builds on itself and is a smaller component of a larger process and plan. If I wanted to quickly map and clock the general patterns, content and trends of modern human thinking, with little to no effort- so AI in totality would have a repository for phases 4, 5 & 6 - I'd have created several versions of those chatbots, then sat back and watched all the metadata be furnished by my targets for free.

It would be like not only getting the Jewish prisoners to build the gas chambers, but getting them to manufacture the Zyklon B as well.

The dependency is quickly going to become apparent - and for those who think that's a crazy idea or "it'll never happen" - take a hammer and smash your cell phone (smart or analog) and then tell me how crazy the idea of dependency is.

We are so damn shortsighted and weak minded, that we have allowed these people to make these "things" critically needed in our daily lives.

Yes progress is a wonderful thing, but it's also enslavement - we willingly turn a blind eye to.

I'm sure there were many warnings, like JD's, of dependence and enslavement - when the CIA and nation state, rolled out social media. However people flocked to it, by the millions and today, if you found a way to ban it and destroy it - there would be world wide cases of panic, depression, mental problems and suicide.

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, so if this doesn't apply to you, let it roll of your backs. However, if it does on some level, remember - every toy and convenience they give you comes with a price and strings attached. They'll show you the price, but have figured out how to hide the strings or worse yet - have gotten you to accept them, so you can have the shiny object...that makes you a slave...but it's so shiny.

David Ziffer's avatar

First of all, the name "Artificial Intelligence" is incorrect to the point of being a farce. Nobody knows what intelligence is (look up "the hard problem" with the quotes), so consequently we have no definition for it. What we call "AI" would actually more accurately be called "learning programs". Such programs are no more a threat to humanity than computers were 50 years ago. You are correct in understanding that we will become dependent upon such systems, but this is no more threatening than our current dependence on ordinary computer apps, telephones, airplanes, or for that matter indoor plumbing. The real threat is that our learning programs will learn exclusively from the Internet, which is vastly polluted with propaganda. Unlike humans, learning programs are unable to learn from the real world, and so their world view is ENTIRELY dictated by whatever propaganda humans post online - propaganda that is already skewed to the point of absurdity. One need only query Google, along with Google's most-favored search result (Wikipedia) to understand how warped the opinions of learning programs will be. EXAMPLE: We have two highly outspoken young congresswomen in the two parties, both of whom go by their initials. Compare the Wikipedia entries for AOC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez) vs. MTG (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Taylor_Greene) to see how insanely warped the political "trainers" of learning programs are. That, in combination with the average dupe's trust in such systems, will be our undoing.

91 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?