16 Comments

Actually I couldn’t finish reading the article as it was so boring- I tuned off halfway through - something I never do with your articles- then I scrolled through and read it was an AI - so that explains my boredom! Brilliant again JD - love your work, thanks!

Expand full comment

ChatGPT will be as evil as most of the journalists featured in the current corporate (main stream) media: the contents will always be driven by hidden agendas using fake news sprinkled with some “well-known facts”. Potentially, such AI engines will be more evil and brutal as the powers are more concentrated in fewer hands.

Expand full comment

Interesting in that AI wasn't making bold predictions like humans do.

Expand full comment

Don't the AI-written articles rely on access to the writings of real people? If so, and AI replaces journalists, will it then rely on its own writings? And if so, how will anything new then be written?

Expand full comment

Thank you for the experience. The writing was mediocre and the tone made it particularly uninteresting. However, it would easily pass as written by a human.

Expand full comment

This is the second article I've read written by ChatGPT which shows an overwhelming bias toward MSM interpretation. E.g., in this article, Chat failed to mention that economic sanctions levied improperly and illegally (certainly Chat has access to international treaties?) by the U.S. against other countries like Russia, Iran, and Syria have forced these nations to look for alternative financial means to engage in trade and the sale of their natural resources. I believe I saw an article yesterday where China is not longer dependent on Swift. I can only conclude that current AI is severely limited in "critical thinking" capability and the smoothness of its delivery beguiles and bamboozles people at this point.

Expand full comment

ChatGPT likes run-on sentences. I find that its work product is cumbersome and not easy to read. Short and to the point sentences is not one of its strengths. Its use of adjectives is over the top and assumes unsupported opinions. The article "feels" biased and therefore I come away skeptical.

Expand full comment

let's be real here. AI will only product products it's only allowed to on every lever. AI will never tell you the real truth about the Petrodollar and wars around the world. Gaddafi was take out because he was selling oil outside of the Petrodollar. All disguised under the Arab spring. Saddam Hussein was taken out all under the cloak of weapons of mass destructions. Even with the CIA knowing who took down the towers. Both were installed by the CIA and If the truth was reveled at the time. The USA population would have had fits. The wars in the middle east have all been over the control of the oil with the US demanding control thru protection. Now we need to look at the real money people. The Rothschilds, Warburg, Rockefellers will not stand to be cut of of the deals. This is part of the issues in Ukraine. Putin started to sell oil out side of the Petrodollar. Again all disguise of an envision by the US. Putin knew of 17 bio labs installed by Obama/Biden and the UN and the world refused to listen. Past treaties of no NATO against the Russia land. Google has hidden the real stories to protect governments. One needs to dig real deep to find the truth but if you followed over years you would have seen the history that was unfolding right before our eyes. Now AI will only write what it can find on the surface.

Expand full comment

Only problem is it wrong ! The USA is bankrupt. Faith in us government is gone! That I the reason for the petro dollar shift. Hit me back computer. Democrats cannot do math but I am sure when any intelligence adds in US debt it will conclude I Am correct. Lol

Expand full comment