The "unexplained" deaths of young people continue to occur, yet nobody in corporate media is asking about what many of us believe is the cause. The jabs may have another victim for their tally.
At some point, you will hear the sophomoric comment: "Correlation is not causation." True enough, but since we are talking humans here, you can't actually run a controlled experiment beyond what is already going on! That is, you have one cohort that is vaxxed and one that is not, and lo and behold, you notice that the vaxxed are dying in this so-called sudden manner.
That's called inductive reasoning, folks, and the concept is hated by the elite, since it leads to all sorts of very unpalatable conclusions. Another example is mass shootings, whereby the perp somehow gets thousands of dollars worth of weapons/ammo, while having no money. And, the authorities are always "this close" to nabbing him. You will NEVER get definitive details on any mass shooting...EVER.
Inductive conclusion: The government is encouraging and sponsoring these shootings, in an effort to get enough people scared so that massive gun laws can be put into place.
Mainly chlorination ... from what I've read. So, as you're saying, correlations cover the good, the bad, and the ugly just as frequently as they don't. Salk was supposedly a eugenics fan. I think the pathway he paved is suspect, simply because there is not other more efficient way to gain access to the interior body of the population ...
And you will rarely hear of the role Big Pharma plays in the mass shooting deaths either. There is almost a 1:1 correspondence between mass shooters and the use of psychotropic drugs. This is true internationally. Correlation is indeed not causation, but it's damned suspect given the widespread ownership of and easy access to firearms throughout American history -- during which mass shootings were not "a thing" (high school kids used to have gun racks in the back of their trucks; open carry & no permitting requirements were widespread; Americans used to keep rifles on their mantlepieces; etc) Pattern recognition & temporal relationships are all part of the scientific method (perhaps even more so in the social sciences), not to mention common sense.
Excellent! Sad to say "drugs" are not the core issue, as people would not be taking them but for the explosion in mental illness--which is also studiously ignored. Many people--especially kids--think that social media is real life, Where else could a bimbo like Olivia Jade be considered an "influencer"?
I'd have to disagree with you as to the legitimacy of putting more than 20% of all US high school boys on psychotropic drugs -- which has been the stat for at least the past two decades. I DO NOT believe 20+% of American young men are mentally ill. There are problems of social destabilization today, but the mass prescription drugging of our youth is a lucrative business model (for Big Pharma as well as Big Med/Psychiatry) and a convenient classroom management tool for teachers & administrators in our public school systems. Virtually none of this is based in genuine science. The entire "chemical imbalance" rationale Big Pharma uses to justify administration of these psychotropic drugs is a marketing slogan, not a research based finding. Dr. Peter Breggin has written at length of the fact that while there is no scientific basis to this marketing claim, the inverse is true: these drugs CAUSE chemical imbalance in the brain. They also alter brain development in these crucial formative years, lay down neurological vulnerabilities for addiction to recreational drugs such as cocaine, have never been tested for drug interactions with the oft-administered cocktails of psychotropic drugs, and have virtually no longitudinal studies. Yes, fatherlessness, lack of church attendance, etc. are all destabilizing to society. But I absolutely reject the idea that the widespread blanketing of our society with psychotropic drugs (and the outright targeting of adolescent males in classrooms) actually represents an accurate picture of anything beyond the stunningly successful non-science-based business models of Big Pharma, Big Psychiatry, and the Educrats.
I was referring to the widespread use of psychotropic drugs in general. Your point is well-taken regarding manufactured mental illness, and Breggin has long been a hero in this regard.
Still, people would not voluntarily turn to "mood enhancers" unless there were something wrong with their mood. Most drug addicts did not become that way solely because of recreation.
Dr. Robert Malone, the man who holds patents on the mRNA technology used in the vaccines, has referred to Pfizer as the world’s largest international criminal organization.
And just look at all the "news" shows Pfizer sponsors...no wonder they're too spineless to investigate. They're all bought & paid for--and were when the mandates were being issued as well to ensure profits. The media is just as complicit as the government and the medical "professionals" taking walking orders (a/k/a "treatments" or lack thereof) from CDC & NIH. It is an unconscionable genocide.
We know the WEF is controlling all of this. It appears there’s about 3 months of diesels being able to operate before the massive food, business and economic displacement begins. Once that begins the economy will shut down then we’ll have no jobs to protect. Then and only then everyone will fight back, rebel and cal these MF’s out and take back our government. It appears it’s gonna get very ugly very soon.
Moderna and Pfizer are probably all over young celebrity SAD situations. Incentivizing all involved to stay silent. I am also learning about other SAD situations from friends and neighbors. No one ever discusses the Vaccine as a cause.
SO WHAT if grieving family members are "instructed not to mention vaccine status or Covid-19 even AFTER doctors determine blood clots were a factor in their loved one's death"?! WHY should any family member honor such a request? Are they being issued with death threats? Swiss bank accounts? If they could find ANY possible good thing to come out of the unjust murder of their loved one, it would be to warn others and possibly save other lives. I do not understand the complicit silence of family members or close friends. That is the kind of silence that dishonors the memory of their loved one (who unfortunately took the shots in good faith precisely because THEY did not know the true dangers) and allows this extraordinarily lucrative wave of killing to continue apace.
I watched a Senate hearing on Covid-19 and the vaccine. One of the things that doctors and others brought up is that people of African descent should be given lower doses of the vaccine due to a genetic health threat. While I know that people can have serious diseases before actually getting symptoms so that they are not truly healthy people, the vaccines have injured or killed too many people who probably would have had years of life left despite unidentified health risks.
When biological men can say they are women and biological women can say they are men, and our government says you can be fined for not respecting their preferred pronouns, why would you expect them to ever tell the truth. They know not the truth and the truth is not in them. And today I am identifying as a plate of mashed potatoes.
At some point, you will hear the sophomoric comment: "Correlation is not causation." True enough, but since we are talking humans here, you can't actually run a controlled experiment beyond what is already going on! That is, you have one cohort that is vaxxed and one that is not, and lo and behold, you notice that the vaxxed are dying in this so-called sudden manner.
That's called inductive reasoning, folks, and the concept is hated by the elite, since it leads to all sorts of very unpalatable conclusions. Another example is mass shootings, whereby the perp somehow gets thousands of dollars worth of weapons/ammo, while having no money. And, the authorities are always "this close" to nabbing him. You will NEVER get definitive details on any mass shooting...EVER.
Inductive conclusion: The government is encouraging and sponsoring these shootings, in an effort to get enough people scared so that massive gun laws can be put into place.
The entire scam of vaccines is propped up by a correlation. ie, deaths decreasing (due to sanitation).
Mainly chlorination ... from what I've read. So, as you're saying, correlations cover the good, the bad, and the ugly just as frequently as they don't. Salk was supposedly a eugenics fan. I think the pathway he paved is suspect, simply because there is not other more efficient way to gain access to the interior body of the population ...
And you will rarely hear of the role Big Pharma plays in the mass shooting deaths either. There is almost a 1:1 correspondence between mass shooters and the use of psychotropic drugs. This is true internationally. Correlation is indeed not causation, but it's damned suspect given the widespread ownership of and easy access to firearms throughout American history -- during which mass shootings were not "a thing" (high school kids used to have gun racks in the back of their trucks; open carry & no permitting requirements were widespread; Americans used to keep rifles on their mantlepieces; etc) Pattern recognition & temporal relationships are all part of the scientific method (perhaps even more so in the social sciences), not to mention common sense.
Excellent! Sad to say "drugs" are not the core issue, as people would not be taking them but for the explosion in mental illness--which is also studiously ignored. Many people--especially kids--think that social media is real life, Where else could a bimbo like Olivia Jade be considered an "influencer"?
I'd have to disagree with you as to the legitimacy of putting more than 20% of all US high school boys on psychotropic drugs -- which has been the stat for at least the past two decades. I DO NOT believe 20+% of American young men are mentally ill. There are problems of social destabilization today, but the mass prescription drugging of our youth is a lucrative business model (for Big Pharma as well as Big Med/Psychiatry) and a convenient classroom management tool for teachers & administrators in our public school systems. Virtually none of this is based in genuine science. The entire "chemical imbalance" rationale Big Pharma uses to justify administration of these psychotropic drugs is a marketing slogan, not a research based finding. Dr. Peter Breggin has written at length of the fact that while there is no scientific basis to this marketing claim, the inverse is true: these drugs CAUSE chemical imbalance in the brain. They also alter brain development in these crucial formative years, lay down neurological vulnerabilities for addiction to recreational drugs such as cocaine, have never been tested for drug interactions with the oft-administered cocktails of psychotropic drugs, and have virtually no longitudinal studies. Yes, fatherlessness, lack of church attendance, etc. are all destabilizing to society. But I absolutely reject the idea that the widespread blanketing of our society with psychotropic drugs (and the outright targeting of adolescent males in classrooms) actually represents an accurate picture of anything beyond the stunningly successful non-science-based business models of Big Pharma, Big Psychiatry, and the Educrats.
I was referring to the widespread use of psychotropic drugs in general. Your point is well-taken regarding manufactured mental illness, and Breggin has long been a hero in this regard.
Still, people would not voluntarily turn to "mood enhancers" unless there were something wrong with their mood. Most drug addicts did not become that way solely because of recreation.
We don't have to agree on every jot & tittle. I very much respect how logically and thoughtfully you present your ideas, even where I differ.
Hope it wakes a few more up, people of all colors on my block are all jabbed up, they took the bait hook line and spike protein.
Dr. Robert Malone, the man who holds patents on the mRNA technology used in the vaccines, has referred to Pfizer as the world’s largest international criminal organization.
And just look at all the "news" shows Pfizer sponsors...no wonder they're too spineless to investigate. They're all bought & paid for--and were when the mandates were being issued as well to ensure profits. The media is just as complicit as the government and the medical "professionals" taking walking orders (a/k/a "treatments" or lack thereof) from CDC & NIH. It is an unconscionable genocide.
We know the WEF is controlling all of this. It appears there’s about 3 months of diesels being able to operate before the massive food, business and economic displacement begins. Once that begins the economy will shut down then we’ll have no jobs to protect. Then and only then everyone will fight back, rebel and cal these MF’s out and take back our government. It appears it’s gonna get very ugly very soon.
Moderna and Pfizer are probably all over young celebrity SAD situations. Incentivizing all involved to stay silent. I am also learning about other SAD situations from friends and neighbors. No one ever discusses the Vaccine as a cause.
SO WHAT if grieving family members are "instructed not to mention vaccine status or Covid-19 even AFTER doctors determine blood clots were a factor in their loved one's death"?! WHY should any family member honor such a request? Are they being issued with death threats? Swiss bank accounts? If they could find ANY possible good thing to come out of the unjust murder of their loved one, it would be to warn others and possibly save other lives. I do not understand the complicit silence of family members or close friends. That is the kind of silence that dishonors the memory of their loved one (who unfortunately took the shots in good faith precisely because THEY did not know the true dangers) and allows this extraordinarily lucrative wave of killing to continue apace.
I watched a Senate hearing on Covid-19 and the vaccine. One of the things that doctors and others brought up is that people of African descent should be given lower doses of the vaccine due to a genetic health threat. While I know that people can have serious diseases before actually getting symptoms so that they are not truly healthy people, the vaccines have injured or killed too many people who probably would have had years of life left despite unidentified health risks.
When biological men can say they are women and biological women can say they are men, and our government says you can be fined for not respecting their preferred pronouns, why would you expect them to ever tell the truth. They know not the truth and the truth is not in them. And today I am identifying as a plate of mashed potatoes.
Excellent point.
"COVID shots" = "Foul play"
If he was working, he was💉.
She, from the looks of it and the article.
Ok, he works as well…
It applies to most who are working. So many 💉 mandates still. We need to realize many are still under tyranny. We r inCanada🤦♀️
Thank you. I try to interject a little humor into otherwise awful observations or I find myself crying into my gravy.
Alternate source reference:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/latest-survey-shows-the-covid-vaccines?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email