A whole lot of people are pointing at the NY Times for their article the day before. It's understandable but it was not an accident. They fell on their sword to keep us looking in the wrong direction.
I agree.. I follow you and read your stories more now because your reporting is better .. you almost lost me when you wrote a story about the PCR tests a few months back.. it's seemed like you were not connecting the dots between the obvious DNA collection and the widespread testing .. this whole thing is about the triple helix .. just saying
As Dan Bongino often reminds his viewers and listeners, don't do or say anything for 24 hours until the real facts become known. Thanks for giving us another reminder. Don't jump on any bandwagon too quickly - we are often being led in the wrong direction on purpose. Thanks for all you do to remind us of simple basic facts.
JD, you continue to be the lodestone, gently pulling us back on course. When we get a little wonky or a little off center, you give us that gentle nudge needed to get back to what's really happening. Thank you.
FYI, poll workers (in Fulton GA) did not double- or triple-count ballots.
If the ballots are slightly dog-eared or not perfectly aligned, they may not feed perfectly into the scanner.
If that happens, the machine alerts the operator. The operator then straightens or fans the stack and puts them through again. If you watch the FULL video (not the edited one), you can see her straightening the ballots and putting them through again.
You can scan as many times as necessary to get a perfect batch, but they are not counted until the operator hits the ACCEPT button.
Scan many, count once. That's how it works, but they didn't explain that in the Giuliani Youtube video because Jackie Pick didn't understand how tabulators work.
Investigators checked those batches. Every ballot scan is associated with an audit layer that records the machine, operator, date, time, batch, and assigns a ballot number. They did not find any evidence that those specific batches from the evening of Nov 3 were double or triple counted. Only once.
The original 80+ hours of surveillance video from 4 camera angles has been online for two years. Unfortunately, most people see the highly-edited version on Youtube which includes erroneous voice-over about suitcases (they're not suitcases, they're ballot bins with wheels), and leaves out the part that shows there were observers plus 24 election workers in the room when the ballots were stowed under the table.
Also, even during the partial cleanup, counting never fully ceased. There were always 1 or 2 counting stations active except for brief moments when they had to stow one batch and get the next one.
I knew nothing other than the fact that Gascon headed the investigation and prosecution--which told me that something was way off. $250,000 million of Soros money given to this nobody-ever-heard-of guy who "wins" the election. Wreaks havoc in L.A.--his DAs hate him, are suing him etc. He is actively working to destroy Los Ahgeles. But all of a sudden he's behind catching a guy in an election fraud scheme? Give me a break! Gascon is nothing short of the get-away car driver.
JD, good job ... discernment is a great concept for our times .. lots to pore through..
I agree.. I follow you and read your stories more now because your reporting is better .. you almost lost me when you wrote a story about the PCR tests a few months back.. it's seemed like you were not connecting the dots between the obvious DNA collection and the widespread testing .. this whole thing is about the triple helix .. just saying
Couldn't get my head around that! Thank you
Los Angeles DA George Gascon assisting in the arrest of this election fraudster ... really?
"Yet there will be those who tell me I sound crazy when I say it was coordinated."
You're not crazy; planned coincidences are a sign of the times.
As Dan Bongino often reminds his viewers and listeners, don't do or say anything for 24 hours until the real facts become known. Thanks for giving us another reminder. Don't jump on any bandwagon too quickly - we are often being led in the wrong direction on purpose. Thanks for all you do to remind us of simple basic facts.
JD, you continue to be the lodestone, gently pulling us back on course. When we get a little wonky or a little off center, you give us that gentle nudge needed to get back to what's really happening. Thank you.
FYI, poll workers (in Fulton GA) did not double- or triple-count ballots.
If the ballots are slightly dog-eared or not perfectly aligned, they may not feed perfectly into the scanner.
If that happens, the machine alerts the operator. The operator then straightens or fans the stack and puts them through again. If you watch the FULL video (not the edited one), you can see her straightening the ballots and putting them through again.
You can scan as many times as necessary to get a perfect batch, but they are not counted until the operator hits the ACCEPT button.
Scan many, count once. That's how it works, but they didn't explain that in the Giuliani Youtube video because Jackie Pick didn't understand how tabulators work.
Investigators checked those batches. Every ballot scan is associated with an audit layer that records the machine, operator, date, time, batch, and assigns a ballot number. They did not find any evidence that those specific batches from the evening of Nov 3 were double or triple counted. Only once.
The original 80+ hours of surveillance video from 4 camera angles has been online for two years. Unfortunately, most people see the highly-edited version on Youtube which includes erroneous voice-over about suitcases (they're not suitcases, they're ballot bins with wheels), and leaves out the part that shows there were observers plus 24 election workers in the room when the ballots were stowed under the table.
Also, even during the partial cleanup, counting never fully ceased. There were always 1 or 2 counting stations active except for brief moments when they had to stow one batch and get the next one.
I heard Gov Kemp in GA signed up with this company for Nov election!!! Errr
I knew nothing other than the fact that Gascon headed the investigation and prosecution--which told me that something was way off. $250,000 million of Soros money given to this nobody-ever-heard-of guy who "wins" the election. Wreaks havoc in L.A.--his DAs hate him, are suing him etc. He is actively working to destroy Los Ahgeles. But all of a sudden he's behind catching a guy in an election fraud scheme? Give me a break! Gascon is nothing short of the get-away car driver.